Minutes:
The Chair stated that following consultation with Members the report contained the emerging
draft programme for the year ahead.
The draft work programme
takes into account last years’ programme, work already committed and feedback
from the recent Work Planning Conference which included input on Council
priorities and strategic challenges, and public issues.
He highlighted the
key considerations for the Committee to think about before agreeing the
programme, and took Members through the detail.
Firstly, he
presented the Committee’s own draft work plan which included specific issues of
concern for focussed discussion at Committee meetings. He mentioned that the
Committee would also coordinate any pre-decision scrutiny activity. There was
some discussion around Committee activity on Crime & Disorder / Safer
Swansea Partnership scrutiny. The desire of the Committee to do more than the
single Committee session on the work and performance of the Safer Swansea
Community Safety Partnership (SSP) was noted. The Chair stated that the inquiry
into Anti-Social Behaviour would touch on the work of the SSP, and that the
Partnership also reports to the Public Services Board (PSB), and therefore
relevant for any PSB Scrutiny Session, for example the Strong Communities PSB
well-being objective encompasses the work / contribution of the SSP to
achieving this objective and is covered in the PSB Annual Report, which would
be discussed at October’s Committee meeting. He emphasised that any additional
Committee session should have a clear and specific purpose / focus, for
example, any aspect the Committee wants to drill down into. Looking back at the February 2022 session
(letter included in the Committee agenda), he pointed out that Committee
members were keen to engage with the development of new SSP Strategy and pick
up progress in relation to improvements following the Mayhill riot. The Chair
also reminded the Committee that scrutiny was about the partnership, and that
there were other arrangements for specifically holding the Police to account.
He referred to the
proposal to set up an Inquiry Panel to
look at Anti-Social Behaviour. Whilst there were some ideas about the
work the Panel could examine, the Panel itself would develop terms of reference
and identify the key question for the Inquiry following an initial briefing
session on the topic.
He stated that
Performance Panels make up the majority of scrutiny activity, as these
represented ongoing monitoring and challenge of key services, holding cabinet
members to account, with ongoing conversation to share their views and
recommendations. It was proposed that
the previously established Performance Panels continue but with a renaming of
the Natural Environment Panel to ‘Climate Change & Nature’, reflecting
recent change in corporate priorities.
In order to provide continuity for this first year of the new Council
term, it was proposed that the Councillors previously acting as conveners, who
wish to continue, be re-appointed in that role, namely:
·
Councillor
Chris Holley as Service Improvement & Finance convener
·
Councillor
Lyndon Jones as Education convener
·
Councillor
Sue Jones as Adult Services convener; and
·
Councillor
Paxton Hood-Williams as Child & Family Services convener
With regard to the
Development & Regeneration and Climate Change & Nature Panels,
expressions of interest were invited, initially from Councillors that have been
previously involved in this work. Based on feedback the Committee was asked to
agree:
· Councillor Chris Holley as Development &
Regeneration convener; and
· Councillor Hannah
Lawson as Climate Change & Nature convener
He reported that
for a more light-touch approach, a
small number of Working Group topics have been identified with a focus on the
Road Safety, Co-production, Swansea as a Healthy City, and Customer Contact.
Members also noted the arrangements for regional scrutiny, as referred to
in para. 4.7 of the report.
He reiterated that
the work programme will be subject to requests for scrutiny throughout the
year. Furthermore, the work
programme would be kept under constant review by the Committee, with changes
made as necessary. The Committee would always retain the flexibility to adapt
and re-prioritise the work of scrutiny, to ensure the continued relevance of
the programme.
He referred to the next Committee meeting scheduled for 16 August. He stated that the Cabinet Member for
Equalities & Culture, Cllr Elliott King, will attend to report on, and take
questions on, his responsibilities relating to the Archives Service and
developments around the new Community Hub, which will house the Service. The
Committee will need to consider questions for that session.
Resolved that:
1)
the Scrutiny Work Programme for 2022/23 (shown in appendix 3), including Inquiry
topics, Performance Panel and Working Group topic priorities be agreed.
2)
the appointment of the Performance Panel Convenors (shown in 4.5) be
agreed.
3)
the proposed Committee work plan (shown in appendix 4) be agreed.
Supporting documents: