Venue: Multi-Location Meeting - Gloucester Room, Guildhall / MS Teams. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services
No. | Item |
---|---|
Disclosures of Personal and Prejudicial Interests. Minutes: In accordance with the Code of Conduct adopted by the City & County of Swansea, the following interests were declared: 1) Councillor O G James declared a Personal Interest in Minute 7 “Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Referral - Alleged Breach of the Code of Conduct by a Former Community Councillor”. |
|
To approve & sign the Minutes of the previous meeting(s) as a correct record. Minutes: Resolved that the Minutes of the Standards Committee held on 23 June 2023 be approved and signed as a correct record subject to Town Councillor Carlo Rabaiotti being shown as being present. |
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Monitoring Officer submitted a report which sought consideration of
the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales (PSOW) referral to the Monitoring Officer
for the Standards Committee to consider in relation to an alleged breach of the
Code of Conduct by former Community Councillor Louise Thomas. The Chair welcomed all to the Committee and introduced the Committee
Members and Officers. The Chair stated that the Committee had previously adopted the Standards
Committee Hearing Procedure. He outlined the three stages of the process that
would be followed: Ø
Stage 1 – Finding of Fact. Ø
Stage 2 – Did the Councillor Fail to follow the
Code. Ø
Stage 3 – Breach of the Code / Consideration of
Sanctions. Stage 1 - Finding of Fact The Chair queried if there was any disagreement with the Undisputed
facts listed in the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales report. Louise Thomas
stated that she disputed Paragraphs 47 & 49 of the report: i)
Paragraph 47 “Former Councillor Thomas did not
attend training on the Code of Conduct, even though she had been booked onto
One Voice Wales training courses.” Louise Thomas agreed that she had not
attended the One Voice Wales, Code of Conduct training; however, she had
attended a Code of Conduct training course with an alternative provider. Louise
Thomas stated that she had attended Code of Conduct training in June. The Chair stated that the Committee would
consider this issue later in the meeting. ii)
Paragraph 49 “None of the complaints made by Former
Councillor Thomas to my office passed the 2-stage test and were therefore not
investigated as no evidence of a breach of the Code of Conduct had been
presented.” Louise Thomas disputed this fact. Leigh
McAndrew confirmed that the Paragraph was accurate. The Chair clarified that
the Paragraph related solely to the Ombudsman’s findings and not to Louise
Thomas’ belief that her complaints were valid. Following the clarification,
Louise Thomas accepted the Paragraph as fact. The Chair queried if there was any disagreement with the Disputed facts
listed in the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales report. Louise Thomas stated
that she now accepted Paragraph 56 as an Undisputed fact. Louise Thomas
accepted that Community Councillor Erasmus did not attend the vote count on
Friday, 6 May 2022. Louise Thomas made her representations to
the Committee. Leigh McAndrew & Louise Thomas were
asked questions by Members of the Standards Committee. They responded
accordingly. The Chair referred to Pages 269 &
270 of the Agenda Pack. Those pages indicate that Louise Thomas received a copy
of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales draft report on 21 February 2023 and
had a deadline to submit any comments to the Ombudsman by 14 March 2023. The
Chair asked Louise Thomas whether she accepted these facts and why she did not
reply to the Ombudsman. Louise Thomas confirmed receipt of the
Ombudsman’s draft report and stated that she had not responded to the draft
report as she no longer lived in Wales, was very busy and that there had been a
family bereavement. The Standards Committee retired to consider Stage 1 - Findings of Fact.
The only issue disputed related to Louise Thomas having attended Code of
Conduct training. (Standards Committee Members & Swansea Council
Officers remained) The Committee discussed the
issues relating to the investigation. Open Session (Louise Thomas, Officers of the Public
Services Ombudsman for Wales & Members of the Public returned) The Chair stated that the Standards Committee had
deliberated the findings of fact as set out in the Public Services Ombudsman for
Wales (PSOW) report. He stated that One Voice Wales had confirmed that Louise
Thomas had not attended Code of Conduct training. He also stated that Swansea
Council had confirmed that it had not held any Code of Conduct training courses
during the period in question. The Chair stated that the Committee had found no evidence
that Louise Thomas had attended Code of Conduct training and on the balance of
probability found that she had not received said training. The Chair asked whether Leigh McAndrew still intending
calling Mumbles Community Councillor Sara Keeton as a witness. Leigh McAndrew
indicated that he did. Louise Thomas indicated that she would like the opportunity
to cross examine the witness as she disputed Community Councillor Sara Keeton’s
evidence. Louise Thomas stated that she believed all the Ombudsman’s witnesses
should be present for her to cross examine. Closed Session (Standards
Committee Members & Swansea Council Officers remained) The Committee discussed the issues relating to the investigation. Open Session (Louise
Thomas, Officers of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales & Members of the Public returned) The Chair stated that the Committee had considered the
question of calling and cross examining the witness. The witness would be
setting out the personal impact that Louise Thomas had on Community Councillor
Sara Keeton. Leigh McAndrew stated that he was happy to rely on Community
Councillor Sara Keeton’s written witness statement. The Chair stated that the witness would
not be called at this time; however, the Committee reserved the right to call
the witness should Louise Thomas be found to have breached the Code of Conduct. Stage 2 - Did the Councillor Fail to follow the Code The Chair asked Louise Thomas if she accepted that she had
breached the following Paragraphs of the Code of Conduct: i)
Paragraph 6 (1) (a) “You must not
conduct yourself in a manner which could reasonably be regarded as bringing
your office or authority into disrepute.” ii)
Paragraph 6 (1) (d) “You must not make
vexatious, malicious or frivolous complaints against other members or anyone
who works for, or on behalf of, your authority.” Louise Thomas indicated that she believed that there was no
breach on either point. Louise
Thomas made her representations to the Committee. Leigh McAndrew, Office of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales made
representations to the Committee. Leigh McAndrew & Louise Thomas were asked questions by Members of
the Standards Committee. They responded accordingly. Louise Thomas & Leigh McAndrew were afforded the
opportunity to make any final relevant representations. The Committee retired to consider their decision as to whether Louise
Thomas had breached the Code of Conduct. Closed Session (Standards
Committee Members & Swansea Council Officers remained) The Committee discussed the issues relating to the potential
breach of the Code of Conduct. Open Session (Louise
Thomas, Officers of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales & Members of the Public returned) The Chair
stated that the Committee had considered the contents of the Public Services Ombudsman
for Wales report dated 21 March 2023, the evidence contained in the Ombudsman’s
report, the agreed facts and representations made by Louise Thomas. The Chair stated that the Committee had found that Louise Thomas had
breached Paragraphs 6 (1) (a) and 6 (1) (d) of the Code of Conduct. Stage 3 - Breach of the Code / Consideration of Sanctions The Chair stated that the Committee would proceed to Stage 3 of the hearing and invited
representations from Leigh McAndrew, Public Services Ombudsman for Wales
Investigating Officer and from Former Community Councillor Louise Thomas. Leigh McAndrew made his representations and stated that there should be a
sanction. He highlighted the Sanctions Guidance issued by the Adjudication
Panel for Wales under Section 75 (10) of the Local Government Act 2000. He also
outlined the mitigating and aggravating factors that the Committee should
consider. Louise Thomas made her representations and stated that there were lies
in the statement and that the Witnesses should have been called for her to
cross examine. The Standards Committee did not ask questions of Leigh McAndrew or of
Louise Thomas. The Committee retired to consider their decision as to whether a
sanction be imposed and if so, the nature of the sanction. Closed Session (Standards
Committee Members & Swansea Council Officers remained) The Committee discussed whether a sanction be imposed and if
so, the nature of the sanction. Open Session (Louise
Thomas, Officers of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales & Members of the Public returned) The Chair of the Standards Committee informed former Councillor Louise
Thomas that the Standards Committee had considered what, if any, sanction to
impose against the background of the Sanctions Guidance issued by the
Adjudication Panel for Wales and its 5-stage approach. The guidance was not
binding on the Committee; however, it was a useful template. The Standards Committee
considered the seriousness of the breaches of Paragraphs 6 (1) (a) and 6 (1)
(d) of the Code of Conduct, the recording being made of a confidential meeting
and the offer to share that recording, the refusal to accept evidence and the
pattern of complaints to the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales over several
months. The Chair stated that the Committee found the effect the complaints had
on others, the lack of reflection, the absence of attending training on the
Code of Conduct, the failure to take advice from the Clerk or the Chair of the
Mumbles Community Council and the failure to use the Local Dispute Resolution
Procedure, and that there was some element of planning in recording the
confidential Committee meeting to be aggravating factors. The Chair stated that the Committee found the inexperience of former
Councillor Thomas, the fact that former Councillor Thomas co-operated with the
Ombudsman and the fact that former Councillor Thomas may have genuinely held
concerns as to what was going on at the Council to be mitigating factors. The Chair stated that the Committee had
considered the range of sanctions available and were mindful of the
representations made by the Ombudsman both as to mitigating / aggravating
circumstances and that the Ombudsman was of the view that a censure or limited
form of suspension was in the public interest in this matter. The Committee
also considered the representations made by Louise Thomas and the fact that she
had apologised for her actions and cooperated with the Ombudsman’s
investigation. Resolved that: 1)
Former Councillor Louise Thomas be found to be in
breach of Paragraphs 6 (1) (a) and 6 (1) (d) of the Code of Conduct. 2)
Former Councillor Louise Thomas be formally
censured for breaching Paragraphs 6 (1) (a) and 6 (1) (d)
of the Code of Conduct. 3)
Should Former
Councillor Louise Thomas still have been a serving Community Councillor, the
Standards Committee would have imposed a 6-month suspension, which is the
maximum period of suspension that the Committee could impose. |
|
Workplan 2023-2024. Minutes: This item was deferred to the next meeitng. |