Venue: Committee Room 5, Guildhall, Swansea. View directions
Contact: Scrutiny 637732
No. | Item |
---|---|
Disclosure of Personal and Prejudicial Interests. Minutes: None |
|
Prohibition of Whipped Votes and Declaration of Party Whips Minutes: None |
|
Letters and Minutes PDF 315 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: Letters and notes were received. |
|
Work Programme 2019/20 PDF 267 KB Minutes: The Work Programme
was noted. |
|
Public Questions Minutes: None |
|
Budget Monitoring 3rd Quarter 2019/20 PDF 510 KB Cllr Rob Stewart (Cabinet
Member for Economy and Strategy) Ben Smith (Chief Finance
Officer) Additional documents:
Minutes: Cllr David Hopkins,
Cabinet Member and the Chief Finance Officer Ben Smith attended the meeting to
discuss the Budget Monitoring 3rd Quarter. The following was discussed: · Directorate position -
forecast variance of £434k for 2019/20 but still a very substantial
improvement. 3 of 4 directorates showing underspend
but some issues within Education Directorate. However, some offsetting
opportunities exist, as shown in the report, in order to balance budget.
Confident that further inroads are being made to
ensure service budgets are back in line for 2019/20. · Use of Contingency Fund
– on the whole contains a number of only small sums
and the vast majority of fund remains available at year end. · Capital Budget –
showing spend of 49.3% of capital budget to end December 2019. · Some concern that Place
Directorate showing underspend when there is pressure on highways maintenance /
difficulty in getting repairs done etc. Ben stated that this does not prevent
the directorate / service from spending money on urgent matters e.g. recent
flooding / impact on infrastructure. Also members queried the fact that
increased electricity costs for street lighting is recurring, rather than
appear as a one-off budget pressure. Ben however was not surprised at this. Also, noted reduced recycling prices in waste management are
contributing to income shortfall. Ben confirmed that recycling market has
become weaker, not just for plastics but metals also and there has been
slow-down in other parts of the world. · Noted that it is too
early to provide accurate forecast as to potential outturn on corporate items
such as Council Tax collection, which is potentially affected
by the effects of welfare reform measures. Ben states welfare reform is in
early stages but does represent a risk – in 2018/19 we
posted a deficit on the collection fund which was unusual for the Council, and
budget assumptions assume slight deficit. · How much is in the
Capital Equalisation Reserve? – Ben confirmed that it had been £15m however on
his advice to Cabinet it was increased by £2.7m (from insurance reserves) · Some discussion about
ER/VR costs – currently not expected to exceed balance on Restructure Reserve
of £3m. Ben commented that in the past it has been higher (e.g. £7m) where use
of contingency fund became necessary. However noted that the Council will incur
costs that will eat into the £3m so we will need funding to top it back up to
£3m. . In-year costs thus charged to contingency were
expected to be zero, so nothing over and above sums already set aside. Future
pressures were set out in the Medium Term Financial
Planning report to Council. |
|
Corporate Complaints Annual Report 2018/19 PDF 166 KB Cllr David Hopkins (Cabinet Member for Delivery and Performance) Sarah Lackenby (Chief Transformation Officer) Additional documents:
Minutes: Cllr David Hopkins,
Cabinet Member and Sarah Lackenby, Chief Transformation Officer attended the
meeting to present the report and answer questions. The main points discussed included: ·
Overall
feeling that this is a positive annual report with some good news. No
significant issues / trends raising concern within. Council is doing very well in view of the
number of complaints and resources we have to deal with them. ·
Whilst
complaints are increasing, it is also a sign of openness to complaints and ease
in which people can make a complaint to the Council. Noted that ‘requests for
service’ have come down significantly. ·
Highlighted
the compliments / positive feedback received by the Council reflected in the
report, including from some of the most vulnerable people we are dealing with ·
Some
issues relating to Welsh Language / translation ·
FOI
requests are reported separately, as Panel suggested
last year, but included in the collection of papers along with the Corporate
Complaints Annual Report as per advice from Information Commissioner’s Office,
for completeness. ·
Councillors
queried the time taken to prepare annual report following completion of the
year in question (i.e. end March 2019) – Sarah explained this was normal and
reporting will always be a year behind, and because of the detailed work required
in order to meet Ombudsman requirements. ·
A
query was raised around social services complaints,
some about contact, and work done by Council to improve recruitment / retention
of social workers. ·
Endorsement
of compliments about Local Area Coordinators, and West Cross Day Service ·
Pleased
to see that only 1 of 83 complaints to the Ombudsman
were upheld. Query around what is meant by 9 being
resolved by ‘quick fix / voluntary settlement’. Sarah mentioned that this would
vary depending on the nature of the complaint but undertook to provide more
information on this in writing. ·
Noted
that number of Stage 1 and Stage 2 complaints have gone up. Query around the
timescales for dealing with complaints. Sarah stated that it is in accordance
with Council’s Complaints Policy and would include information about timescales
in future reports, for clarity. Though stressed that there is no issue around
the council meeting agreed timescales for dealing with complaints. ·
The
FOI report shows that 103 of the 1403 FOI requests were completely
refused. The Panel wanted to know the grounds upon which requests could be refused. The
Convener also recommended that future reports should show the actual cost
incurred by the Council through dealing with FOI, and their impact on the
budget, as a matter of public interest. |
|
Wales Audit Office Report on Local Government Use of Data PDF 330 KB Cllr Rob Stewart (Economy and Strategy) Steve King (Research and Information GIS Team Leader) Additional documents: Minutes: Cllr Clive Lloyd,
Cabinet Member, Steve King, Information Research and GIS Team Leader and Sarah
Lackenby, Chief Transformation Officer attended to present the report and
answer questions. The main points noted
include: ·
Recognition
of the importance for the Council to manage data effectively ·
Key is
to develop specific Data Strategy, as recommended by Wales Audit Office, which
will help the Council to address the issues highlighted within the audit, and
have a clear way forward across the four areas (Vision, Leadership and Culture;
Data Protection; Skills and Capacity; Evidence-based Decision Making). Whilst
there are existing strategies which encompass data and
information it is agreed that an overall strategy and vision for the Council’s
use of data should be developed to provide a framework for considering
subsequent actions. ·
An
Action Plan has been developed in response to the 11
WAO recommendations – Steve King took the Panel through each recommendation and
proposed action. ·
Council
is in relatively early stages of thinking on this. ·
A
Digital Strategy is being prepared and pre-decision
scrutiny on this is welcomed. ·
A
follow up on progress with the action plan will be reported to the Panel in due
course ·
The
Wales Audit Office have their own process of monitoring progress. ·
Query around
the WAO recommendation that the Council sets data reporting standards to ensure
minimum data standards underpin decision-making – exactly how we would identify
minimum standards and what they would look like – was felt to be a difficult
area to unpick. Also, some concern about resourcing to
undertake all this work. Steve stated that the Council would work with the
auditor and other Councils to identify good practice in data reporting etc. but
the Council was at relatively early stages of thinking on this. Sarah stated
that this was about a whole-Council approach to data, with everyone having
responsibility and being involved, and the Council increasing its maturity
around use of data. ·
Query
around what exactly is meant by ‘data’ – numerical or
information. It was suggested that it should include
information and evidence as a whole, although the data strategy would clarify
this. ·
Some
discussion around WAO view that the Council should review the range and quality
of information needed by decision-makers to support evidence-based decision making. Some concern that the Audit raised some
questions about whether the Council uses data to inform decisions and whether
it is thoroughly embedded within the culture of the
Authority. Discussion had around whether evidence can be misleading or skewed
and therefore may not lead to the best decision. ·
It was
felt the Action Plan could have more detail around implementation timescales
e.g. not just when the Data Strategy will be prepared. ·
Some
interest in the ‘Swansea Account’ project – noted WAO’s recommendation for
Councils to create a central integrated customer account as a gateway to
services. Panel noted this is largely reflected in the
Council’s existing proposals to provide a single digital identity for citizens
to access online services. This will be done initially
by developing a digital platform and upgrading the Council website. The ‘Swansea Account’ is the Council’s
proposed integrated secure online citizen/business account, where all
information and services received can be viewed in one
place (similar to dealing with any other organisation, e.g. utility companies,
banks). Panel queried whether libraries would be part of that account. Sarah
responded that it is an option that will be looked at,
although a lot of research and development is still to be done on this project
including what is possible from technology.
Things are at a very early stage. ·
Specific
questions that the Convener wants a response to:
whether the Council sells any data; who the Council shares data with; and what
are our responsibilities around sharing? He stated that data mining is a
massive issue and that the Council collects a huge amount of data including
sensitive information such as medical information. Some discussion around whether the Council should sell data for
income. Sarah referred to data sharing protocols in place. |
|