Venue: Multi-Location Meeting - Gloucester Room, Guildhall / MS Teams. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services - 636923
No. | Item | |
---|---|---|
Disclosures of Personal and Prejudicial Interests. Decision: None Minutes: In accordance with the Code of Conduct adopted by the City and County of Swansea, no interests were declared. |
||
To approve & sign the Minutes of the previous meeting(s) as a correct record. Decision: Approved Minutes: Resolved that the minutes of the meeting held on 5 July 2022 be approved and signed as a correct record. |
||
Items for deferral/withdrawal. Decision: None Minutes: None. |
||
Determination of Planning Applications under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. PDF 94 KB Additional documents:
Decision: 2021/3182/FUL - Approved Minutes: A planning application was presented on behalf of the Head of Planning & City Regeneration. Amendments/updates to this schedule were reported and are indicated below by (#) (Note: Updates to the report referred to below were circulated to Members of the Committee and published on the Council’s website prior to the meeting. Resolved that the undermentioned planning application Be Approved subject to the conditions in the report and/or indicated below: #(Item 1) –
Planning Application 2021/3182/FUL - Residential development comprising 17 no.
dwellings (8 x 2 bed, 9 x 3 bed) and 18 no. flats (14 x 1 bed, 4 x 2 bed) and
associated infrastructure work at Land at Samlet Road , Llansamlet, Swansea A visual presentation was given. Report updated as follows: Since the report
was finalized, full comments have been received from the Local Highways
Authority (LHA) on the amended submission. The LHA had
previously commented that they had no objections and this remains. The comments
are included in full below: “Background This application has been submitted following the Pre-Application
Consultation period within which the Highway Authority submitted a formal and
detailed response. A formal response had already been submitted on this
application. This updated response has been provided in response to amended
plans submission. The previous response has therefore been considered and any
outstanding issues raised and confirmed as appropriate. There are some noted changes to the content of the residential dwellings
and the internal layout, since the last submission which was reviewed. Access The previous comments raised the requirement
for a right turn lane to be provided and also shown within the swept path
assessments. This has been addressed in terms of the more recent plans. It was also set out that the submitted plan will be required to include
the appropriate dimensions confirmed such as road and lane widths and kerb
radii. This has been concluded to a position acceptable at planning stage. The swept paths undertaken for access, and internal layouts were
requested to include assessed vehicle speeds and that a simultaneous assessment
of a box luton home delivery van passing a private car, through was shown. This
has been provided and there are no further issues to raise as part of this
application. The swept path of the refuse vehicle was the subject of discussion where
on initial consideration it did show that the manoeuvres are oversail or were
unacceptably close to footways and verges. This has been progressed to a
position where the assessment using robust vehicle has been carried out with
appropriate speeds indicated throughout the development. The manoeuvres at the
access do overrun centrelines on the minor and major arms, although it has been
taken into account that the site is an existing commercial premises which has
two access points that would have been served by HGVs. Internal Access The request to show full 2.0 metre wide
footways on both sides of the internal layout appears to have been addressed. It was requested that the internal junctions are assessed for junction
visibility, it is noted that these are shown as footway crossovers which ensure
that pedestrians retain priority. The verge area, if contained to low planting,
should allow pedestrian inter visibility splays. These would include those
internal road widths would also need to be set out, noting previous advice that
5.5 metres would be considered the minimum to allow two way trave, although it
is worth adding, 6 metres width is generally the acceptable width to provide
easy parking access. It was confirmed that the Parking SPG contains advice on parking courts
and maximum numbers to be served. This set out a maximum of 12 can be served in
a court format, the layout currently shows 14 spaces in one court. Whilst this
is not strictly in accordance with the Parking SPG, wider consideration has
been given to the to the parking court layout for a balanced view. The area is
spacious, adequate circulation area has been provided and the conflicts with
cycle storage that were raised have been resolved. The intended use of the
development for social housing has been considered and that the development
will remain in singular Housing Association ownership does allow for continued
management and intervention if required. The assessment of a refuse vehicle shows it will remain on the central
route. It was requested that a refuse strategy demonstrate that all resident
homes or bin collection points are within maximum walking distances for
residents and refuse handlers. This has been developed in sufficient detail and
is accepted. The internal route as shown has been considered in terms of whether home
delivery vans can attend the dwellings within a reasonable walking distance,
this appears to be achievable. Parking The parking provision within the site has been confirmed to be in
accordance with the specification set out within the Parking SPG, 2.6 metres by
4.8 metres. As set out earlier the provision of parking courts is advised upon
within the SPG and also visitor parking is accepted to occur organically at
appropriate locations within the layout. The parking provision for the proposed development was previously
subject to an accessibility assessment, which is the appropriate method to
assess the sustainable location of a site and determine whether justification
exists to reduce parking provision. The parking provision cannot fall below one space per dwelling. A review
of the parking against house types and bedrooms suggest that these are in the
realms of the discounted amount. It was noted that a house type with two beds
alternated in provision of one and two spaces through the layout. The
conclusion was that whilst this was confusing, it was not below the maximum
permitted discounted of one space. General parking comments would include, that spaces at the end of an
arrangement or against a solid boundary generally require some additional width
buffer, in the order of 500mm. It is raised that the car parking spaces located
near cycle parking enclosures could be at conflict. The current version of the
masterplan has resolved these issues appropriately. The accessible parking bays associated with the accessible flat
provision have been marked out in the way requested. Cycle parking provision has been included and the detail provided, the
parking provision for the flats equals one cycle space per units located over
three units. A total of 20 spaces are proposed ensuring a minimum of one space
per unit. Sustainable
Travel Enhancements It was previously confirmed that should the scheme be successfully
promoted through planning in some form, there will be financial contributions sought
for local improvement schemes. This was set out as a shared use track to be
provided, at the developers expense, from the south west of
the application site to link to the Enterprise Zone 'yellow cycle route'
to allow for increased cycle/pedestrian access to the Enterprise Zone and
beyond. There has been agreement received from the applicant on the request to
fund this enhancement and connection to the existing active travel route. It
was confirmed that financial contribution is to be made of £15,000 by way of
Section 106 Agreement. What will be required is for the development layout to provide the
connection point to this layout, that is a point within, and up to, the
boundary. This will be required to provide an active travel corridor from within
the site to the proposed connection. Highway Authority Response to this Application: As advised in previous consultation response, the Highway Authority
would not likely object subject to the issues raised being fully addressed. Following additional dialogue and exchanges, this has been completed to
a position where the application can be supported. The Highway Authority
therefore does not recommend objection, subject to the inclusion of appropriate
planning conditions. The recommended conditions are set out below:
Note: Application
approved in accordance with recommendation subject to a Section 106 Agreement
being signed and condition 26 being added. |
||
Additional documents:
Decision: Approved Minutes: The Lead Lawyer on behalf of the Head of Planning and City Regeneration presented a report which outlined that an application has been received from the Welsh Government to amend the Register of Common Land by removing land from Llangyfelach Common which was compulsorily purchased in 1969 for the M4 highway construction and the registration of other land that was provided in exchange. The background details and history to the matter were outlined and detailed in the report by Officers, including the land affected, the legal procedures followed, the preliminary considerations and consultations undertaken. No objections or representations were received regarding the matter and the conclusion of the evidence supplied is that the taken land ceased to become common land and the substituted land became common land following the order in 1969. Resolved that the application be accepted and the Register of Common Land be amended as follows: 1) the land identified in this report as the “Substituted Land” be added to Register Unit CL49: Llangyfelach Common; and 2) the land identified in this report as the ‘Taken Land’ be removed from Register Unit CL49: Llangyfelach Common. |